From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 1 20:52:45 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA22617 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 20:52:45 -0800 Received: from magic.winnet.net (magic.winnet.net [204.215.2.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA22611 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 20:52:43 -0800 Received: (from piero@localhost) by magic.winnet.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA02241; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 23:53:11 -0500 From: Piero Serini Message-Id: <199504020453.XAA02241@magic.winnet.net> Subject: Re: why not 2+ freebsd partitions per disk? To: bugs@ns1.win.net (Mark Hittinger) Date: Sat, 1 Apr 1995 23:53:10 -0500 (EST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199504020338.WAA01108@ns1.win.net> from "Mark Hittinger" at Apr 1, 95 10:38:13 pm Reply-To: Piero@winnet.net Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.0-SNAP X-Phone-Number: +1 (305) 535 3090 X-Faqs-Maintained: Elm (comp.mail.elm), Mail Archive Servers (comp.mail.misc) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 459 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello. Quoting from Mark Hittinger: > Just a quick question - is there a technical reason why two or more freebsd > partitions per disk cannot be done? Or is it just some code that hasn't > been written yet? :-) Since when? I have a disk w/ 3 partitions on it. Or maybe I didn't understand your question. Bye, -- # $Id: .signature,v 1.0 1995/02/05 17:34:46 piero Exp $ Piero Serini