From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 12 07:40:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E694516A418; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9BE43D48; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:40:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFB0170DE; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:40:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Robert Watson From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:08:43 +0100." <20060612080504.W26634@fledge.watson.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:40:13 +0000 Message-ID: <34100.1150098013@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FILEDESC_LOCK() implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:40:16 -0000 In message <20060612080504.W26634@fledge.watson.org>, Robert Watson writes: >At least in the VFS and socket code, you want a notion of acquiring both and >dropping one, or upgrading/downgrading. The logic tends to go something like >this: That's different from what FILEDESC needs. FILEDESC has two different classes of operations: cheap/non-sleeping and expensive/sleeping -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.