From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Aug 13 17: 9:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA6C15085 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:08:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA24841; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 18:07:39 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990813180524.04845530@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 18:06:41 -0600 To: "Mark S. Reichman" , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: BSDs fragmented? Then whats this called? In-Reply-To: <37B4B106.5B1B567D@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Eric Raymond is the source of the nonsense about the BSDs being "fragmented." The "Haloween document" (which Raymond claims was leaked from Microsoft, but who knows if it was or not?) makes this claim, and the Linuxoids have continued to trumpet it. --Brett Glass At 07:57 PM 8/13/99 -0400, Mark S. Reichman wrote: >I was reading some articles emphasizing that BSD is fragmented. >(Free, Net, Open)... Would these authors please take a >look at all the possible Linux fragments one can get >nowadays. Source.. http://www.linux.com/jumpstart/ > > Caldera OpenLinux > Debian GNU/Linux > Linux Mandrake > LinuxPPC > MkLinux > Red Hat Linux > Slackware Linux > Stampede Linux > S.u.S.E. Linux > TurboLinux > UltraPenguin > Yellow Dog Linux > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message