From owner-freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Tue Dec 19 19:13:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DDBE9900A for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771E0669F7; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.128.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D30202601A5; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:13:07 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: FreeBSD amd64 GENERIC kernel To: blubee blubeeme , Tijl Coosemans Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger References: <20171216143349.Horde.VJOddyv79ydlAmvsvoTRhMP@webmail.leidinger.net> <20171218161614.Horde.rLEhw6yp6nTppNjkXU-WxBF@webmail.leidinger.net> <20171218183353.Horde.xayrSeFXKKiQwenaLS-GOsK@webmail.leidinger.net> <20171219122952.Horde.2UnAC3-TFrteTTD2_YJXPpJ@webmail.leidinger.net> <603cca63-2689-432e-dd07-d08bf8e1ee4c@selasky.org> <20171219160413.4055d734@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <4744f602-85fb-2dc9-af17-77e815ef81e7@selasky.org> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:10:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:13:11 -0000 On 12/19/17 18:30, blubee blubeeme wrote: > Why not start from what 4Front OSS provides and then add the features that > are missing, > instead of re-implementing everything that 4Front provides? Hi Blubee, Try to answer the questions already presented in this e-mail thread. --HPS