Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:10:00 +0530 From: Devdas Bhagat <devdas@worldgatein.net> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail and virus checking Message-ID: <20020209191000.A54890@rivendell.worldgatein.net> In-Reply-To: <20020208110825.G88900-100000@falken.reliable-net.net>; from sblaydes@rnetinc.net on Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:10:29AM -0500 References: <20020208212420.B49605@rivendell.worldgatein.net> <20020208110825.G88900-100000@falken.reliable-net.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/02/02 11:10 -0500, Scott Blaydes wrote: > > I use amavisd and it works quite well. Lower overhead, until I throw ~ > > 60 simultaneous mails at it (very low end box, and it does other things > > as well, lots of them). It runs trendmicro's filescan, on RH 7.1 > Had you ever ran amavis-perl? If so, does the amavisd run a lower load? I did not run amavis-perl, because amavisd does not fork a copy of perl for each mail. > I have a dual 1g P3 box with 1gb ram and a raid5 of 5 80mb/s Hard drives > and I still get high loads (5+) on this box when it starts getting hit > hard by mail. amavisd will imrove performance. Devdas Bhagat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020209191000.A54890>