From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 25 17:11:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B2837B401 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 17:11:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thingy.apana.org.au (thingy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8F443FAF for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 17:11:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from fun by thingy.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19K5aL-0001X8-00 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:11:29 +1000 Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 10:11:29 +1000 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030526001129.GC16799@thingy.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: David Gerard Subject: What will this linux-compat kludge do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 00:11:36 -0000 I wanted to get the Linux binary of Mozilla Firebird working on 4.8-RELEASE. I found this kludge on the Web (from the FreeBSD linux-phoenix port) and applied it: # cd /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib # ln -s libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 There's something about that that just looks so wrong and bad ... I was just wondering what ill effects this might have on other Linux binaries that think they're actually getting 6.2-2. Anyone know? But opera, realplay and MozillaFirebird work, so I'm happy for now ;-) - d.