From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 7 06:50:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0077716A406; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 06:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9350F13C4B9; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 06:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ninth-nine.com ([IPv6:2001:3e0:4cf:1:d2:ff:fe23:1b4]) (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NinthNine) with ESMTP id l376o44Q097531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:50:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 04:12:36 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: Jung-uk Kim Message-Id: <20070407041236.d4cb0d39.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200704061505.18799.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070407023855.ede13b76.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200704061351.30424.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20070407032643.72fd55df.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200704061505.18799.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.0beta7 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [IPv6:2001:3e0:4cf:0:230:48ff:fe41:2455]); Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:50:05 +0900 (JST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura Subject: Re: Cannot mount linprocfs by unresolving sysvs?m symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 06:50:08 -0000 On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:05:16 -0400 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > 'dependency of dependency' you saied is not broken. It's > > specification:-) of kernel symbol resolver. It can resolve > > one level export symbols:-(. > Okay, can we fix the 'specification', then? ;-) Of course, I have no idea!! :D