Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:15:49 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net> Cc: Florian Smeets <flo@FreeBSD.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy Message-ID: <b10cc27c-d2f9-5c81-115b-2f577ff6f825@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <9646fd5d0666c8e57795ea1b370b6af1@mail.infomaniak.com> References: <435edf7c-a956-4317-b327-3372de70dbef@FreeBSD.org> <1c5b7818-842f-f7b8-9d4e-5bf681cad20e@grosbein.net> <c5e3e5d2d058d90777828b88a0f1506e@mail.infomaniak.com> <64c7435c-2d69-1f62-ba7c-30812860a457@grosbein.net> <9646fd5d0666c8e57795ea1b370b6af1@mail.infomaniak.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
12.03.2024 3:24, Daniel Engberg пишет: [skip] > Another possible option would be to add something to the port's matedata that makes pkg aware and easy notiable > like using a specific color for portname and related information to signal > like if it's red it means abandonware and potentially reduced security. Of course, we need to inform users but not enforce. Tools, not policy. Eugene
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b10cc27c-d2f9-5c81-115b-2f577ff6f825>