Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:26:20 -0700 From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> To: arch@FreeBSD.org Cc: tlambert2@mindspring.com Subject: Re: Solving the stack gap issue Message-ID: <20020821122620.GD86074@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <3D632BA8.45C64D10@mindspring.com> References: <200208171918.aa72556@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <20020818055951.N12475-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <15714.17605.575558.398279@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820153515.GL75574@elvis.mu.org> <20020820184624.GB86074@elvis.mu.org> <3D62D292.D0F3FEE6@mindspring.com> <20020821011201.GC86074@elvis.mu.org> <3D632BA8.45C64D10@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > Maxime Henrion wrote: > > Terry Lambert wrote: > > > I thought this was already do-able on a call by call basis? From > > > sysent.h: > > [ripped code] > > > > I'm aware of this flag, the subject of this thread was about *removing* > > it and let the syscalls acquire Giant on an invidual basis. > > I think you've misinterpreted. > > Can't this be done one function at a time *using this flag*? > > I don't see what the big deal is about, if this can be done > incrementally, is all. In the p4 branch I was talking about, all the syscalls have been taken care of already. That's why the SYF_MPSAFE flag has been removed. Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020821122620.GD86074>