Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:27:29 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 8.x Message-ID: <20090705112728.GC86673@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <200907042034.n64KYONY099475@triton.kn-bremen.de> References: <200907032226.n63MQ7wq045645@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <200907042034.n64KYONY099475@triton.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--KHHg66sM3ACL179N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:34:24PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
>=20
> ..anyone happen to know why it got only the flash-related
> patches here (Mk/bsd.linux-apps.mk ftp/linux-f10-curl/Makefile
> linux-f10-flashplugin10/{Makefile,distinfo}) but not the new
> ports (security/linux-f10-cyrus-sasl2 and net/linux-f10-openldap)?
> I mean I certainly committed the new ports first... :)
>=20
Probably some fluke in the way the tree is synchronized where, as it
would seem, new files arrive later than modified files. I've seen
similar errors before, but it's too entangled to pinpoint the exact
cause.
Cheers,
-erwin
--=20
Erwin Lansing (o_ _o) http://droso.org
\\\_\ /_///
The rest is silence <____) (____> erwin@lansing.dk
--KHHg66sM3ACL179N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFKUI4gqy9aWxUlaZARAoM7AKDyvuPtCQjtscVlfBaQBLmr5oha4gCg9AUO
VJAcR9xGLprgsYAZNhuAC+g=
=YkZ/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KHHg66sM3ACL179N--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090705112728.GC86673>