From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 8 12:57:28 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA12659 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 12:57:28 -0800 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA12581; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 12:57:05 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA16579; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 22:54:12 +0200 Message-Id: <199503082054.WAA16579@grunt.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grunt.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Joe Greco cc: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray), phk@ref.tfs.com, barry@nacm.com, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, security@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: key exchange for rlogin/telnet services? Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 22:54:12 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Because there wasn't one. > > > > What are the chances of "sanitising" a diff so I can track you work here? > > I have some of the DES stuff available. > > 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Something closely approximating zero, because I do not have a clue as to > what is legal and/or allowable, and I don't really have the time to go figure > it out. If somebody has a short, clear, and concise definition available of > what is legal, I might reconsider. If another US resident would like to > deal with this, *by* *all* *means* I would be willing to hand this over to > that party. I am simply not interested in potentially violating some rather > ugly (but senseless) laws and get tossed in some deep Federal dungeon > somewhere.. Hokay. I understand _totally_ your sentiments. This scenario has happenned before (and it is legal too, beleive it or not!) If you have an account in the US, could you make you code available there? I have an account on thud.cdrom.com, which is in Walnut Creek, SF (co- ordinates available on request :-). If you wish, I can work on the code, _in_the_US_, and only bring back that which is legal. If you feel uncomfortable with this, "Andrew Chernov" (sp?) has already done similar acts from the (ex-) Soviet Union with no dis- approval from the world at large (please could anyone shout REAL loud if this is bullshit (I think it is not)). (This (if memory serves me) was to do with the US PGP code). Thanks! Mark -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200