From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 07:00:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C531516A4CE for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:00:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr4.ruhr.de [212.23.134.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4EE343D41 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ue@nathan.ruhr.de) Received: (qmail 6023 invoked by uid 10); 31 Dec 2003 15:00:03 -0000 Received: from nathan.internal (localhost.internal [127.0.0.1]) by nathan.internal (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBVEoNkM004469; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:50:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ue@nathan.internal) Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.internal (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBVEoNU8004468; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:50:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:50:22 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: Ceri Davies Message-ID: <20031231145021.GD45118@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20031230004119.GA19005@nathan.ruhr.de> <20031230.194507.56983609.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20031231120956.GC45118@nathan.ruhr.de> <20031231142028.GB33404@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031231142028.GB33404@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doc.common.mk 1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:00:10 -0000 --RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:20:28PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:09:56PM +0100, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: >=20 > > I understand the need for some "guess-the-langcode-from-the-path" > > logic in the current build infrastructure to handle "cd /usr/doc;make" > > and stuff like that. I am not happy with it (what's so bad about > > adding LANGCODE?=3D to each Makefile?), but that is another > > matter. >=20 > Actually, that is a very good question. My usual assumption is that people thought about this when setting up the current guess-the-langcode system. In other words, there must be a good reason. The only one I can think of is the problem of changing langcodes (like the change to X11-compatible names we did some time back). =20 > By extension, if there is a lot of stuff that translations need to carry > around, then what is wrong with ".include ${DOC_PREFIX}/share/mk/doc.jp.m= k" > or similar? Yes, this could help a lot, because it makes it possible to set the LANGCODE, maybe different binaries (especially for the generation of .txt files, this seems to be broken for DE still), etc. /s/Udo --=20 Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. --RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBP/LiLUPoh1XnT6hxAQGCGQP9FEAdo213FZ2q4RnY0g3uh/GrpB0qHm0t y3ftnFjJvmYGcW8Riyxax7LqmFJz29BcD/aImG0EUtExYx7ffsKhtqSsqWHVZ6GZ hS98z6Zk94HAsMxPc3FyGQ7IRVkj9j+pYrDE1P86aFDFPfB0cmPdjeL+uSZNB4Ny SFUgsk+SzhM= =LFA0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4--