From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 22:08:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF641065689 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9FA8FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so364913ywe.13 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:08:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=iOtiK9GDl0EOoHdfDnMKNxD2MgN2vYVstha5oPBRGuQ=; b=iAlhstuDNWYSRPN3fsonN/W5AxG7ZmCj0IJoEAIpsplWQ7bue/7If7At83rdWisc3Y pYbpBtV0XbBq/Msi/SnN+OA6z2Xqt8H4Y3kFpH7eG86DtYF4DQgcVF4vhduGNvCV6VsI 6GhP38H5ql1fEbWnGPmOvcB4ccXS1E/RXtUwc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mr1YPZ981o3bUkGrlfqYtomDxHPzQC7QcpEKNBHfr2vWeaqkrcpH0urtw/qNLSLHkL e2tmXtqJk3UI4tH1tqAigFUxR/taPJkA3kRfXrAR0F59b4okgSLIsAEzxPSLV7ivYBOH gVje3/0t/9END8T6gg5vmuh67Z2PeXRDhw5FU= Received: by 10.142.255.14 with SMTP id c14mr4967495wfi.296.1225404531689; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.141.5 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90810301508q32d6d920re36177450954e902@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:08:51 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "Lowell Gilbert" In-Reply-To: <44iqr9rfz0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <539c60b90810301128j2493c4c1wc9519a6fef834490@mail.gmail.com> <539c60b90810301129x58a6e5des56c062ecbb262663@mail.gmail.com> <44iqr9rfz0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4c9eb10d4a146b60 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: kqemu runs 2x faster on i386 than amd64!? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:08:53 -0000 > "Steve Franks" writes: > >> Guess I should've mentioned the target is 32-bit win2k... > > If the target isn't the same as the host, I think it's going to have > to use (at least partial) emulation instead of direct execution... Yes, but isn't that the same for win2k regardless of wether the host is fbsdamd64 or fbsdi386? Or are you talking 64 vs. 32 bit? > >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Steve Franks wrote: >>> I'm not comparing apples-to-apples exactly, but both my disks are in >>> the same system, both are running 7-stable from within the last few >>> months, so it's pretty close. Also, the i386 is a direct replacement >>> of the amd64 to fix this and other problems, so the software & >>> settings set is pretty identical also... >>> >>> kqemu crawls when I boot amd64 (and I notice the processor is always >>> over 50%), and it's reasonalbly usable on i386 (also, the processor is >>> often in the 30% range, instead of 60%). >>> >>> Steve >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > -- > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area > http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ >