From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:08:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF714A3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A831DAF7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YAeiy-0003s4-Tm; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:08:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:08:04 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> Cc: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:08:07 -0000 Hi! > No disputing that, just thinking, is FreeBSD being driven by user need, > financial contributer need, developer need, security need, making things > 'better' or just by people wanting to make their mark in a warped sense > of "it'll all get better"...? Probably by developer *capacity* (not need) and fire-fighting, like most IT stuff 8-( -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !