From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 10:40:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33516A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:40:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6316D43D3F for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bd5As-0005fe-VD; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:40:16 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bd5AU-0001t8-JP; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:39:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:39:50 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20040622100825.01f0b258.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Message-ID: References: <20040621132006.2b1a296f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040621172520.3544d6fe.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040621214348.GB63857@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <40D76DA3.9090809@mac.com><40D79FF9.20308@mac.com> <20040622084726.524bfa39.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <3016.217.162.71.141.1087911989.squirrel@serv04.inetworx.ch> <20040622100825.01f0b258.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Level: / cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: "David E. Meier" Subject: Re: [OT] Re: What's the best possible email failover solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:40:22 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bill Moran wrote: > The other option is to take what appears to be the best IMAP server out > there (Cyrus) and figure out a way to do real-time mirroring of the > mailboxes. I was wondering if it could be done with Coda, but I don't > know anything about Coda, and it doesn't look like I'll have time to > experiment in the near future. A previous responder to this thread has already pointed at the cam.ac.uk work which offers transactional replication for fast fail-over. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ "Impact of vulnerability: Run code of an attacker's choice Maximum Severity Rating: Moderate" -- M$ security bulletin