Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:14:35 +0100 From: Gunnar Flygt <gunnar.flygt@sr.se> To: Dave Uhring <duhring@charter.net> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability Message-ID: <20030103081435.GA5619@sr.se> In-Reply-To: <200301021809.11132.duhring@charter.net> References: <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> <20030103000232.GA52181@blazingdot.com> <200301021809.11132.duhring@charter.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:09:11PM -0600, Dave Uhring wrote: > On Thursday 02 January 2003 06:02 pm, Marcus Reid wrote: > > I like to point people in the direction of: > > > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html > > > > The list is dominated by FreeBSD machines with > > uptimes of longer than 1000 days. > > > > Go FreeBSD. > > You do realize, I hope, that Linux and Solaris roll over their uptimes > at something like 492 days. Strange, I do not see this behaviour on one of our Solaris boxes: Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.5.1 Generic May 1996 bash-2.00# uptime 9:05am up 1102 day(s), 15:42, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.02 So it seems to me at least that Solaris does not roll over. Or should I say Solaris 2.5.1 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030103081435.GA5619>