Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:59:28 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iocage Message-ID: <20170412035928.GC64587@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <CALd%2BdcfzZ5CLjaCKPhA3z729vcPDNX09cj%2BqoFWLV2gMz_BsJw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALd%2Bdcc9k%2BRBWiV8se5GAUpBhJ3KfNm_UXpvS2TGFA7oyiMSWg@mail.gmail.com> <CALd%2BdcfzZ5CLjaCKPhA3z729vcPDNX09cj%2BqoFWLV2gMz_BsJw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I see that sysutils/iocage has been removed. However, the current version > of py-iocage is two releases old and is lacking some features that iocage > provided. Can that get upgraded so it is possible to switch without losing > necessary functionality? There are two ports: sysutils/py3-iocage, @0.9.7, which requires python 3.6 and higher and sysutils/py-iocage, @0.9.5, which probably can be upgraded to 0.9.6 at most, due to the py3 requirement. So, what's the problem with py3-iocage ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170412035928.GC64587>