From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 16 03:32:44 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48762106566B;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:32:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E876A14DC7F;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:32:42 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <502C69D9.8040803@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:32:41 -1000
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org>
References: <7mlihf1vmg.wl%kuriyama@s2factory.co.jp>
	<502C65A0.2060606@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAEz5XLQa9zEa2MPQ4+yoAEOf959Tc4oa04pBrpiLXctR8N-V9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEz5XLQa9zEa2MPQ4+yoAEOf959Tc4oa04pBrpiLXctR8N-V9g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [patch] etc/rc.d/jail: allow extra parameters for each jails
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:32:44 -0000

On 08/15/2012 05:24 PM, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> 2012/8/16 Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>:
>> On 08/15/2012 03:19 PM, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>>>  #jail_example_flags="-l -U root"             # flags for jail(8)
>>> +#jail_example_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1"       # extra parameters for this jail
>>
>> Why not just use _flags for this?
> 
> Current implementation of rc.d/jail uses old command line syntax which
> cannot pass parameters to jail(8), so main modifications of my patch
> is changing this to use new command line style to use with "-c" flag
> and named parameters.
> 
> Then, you are right, these named parameters can be passed via _flags
> after my patch.  I just want separate command line option flags and
> named parameters.  I don't have strong argument to add _parameters
> variables.  I just think adding _parameters may be easy to
> configure/understand.

Thank you for the explanation. FWIW, this sounds reasonable to me.

Doug