Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:55:46 +0100 (CET)
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: BSDStats ... are  you reporting?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903061051190.11588@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <CC45FB32-EF5B-47E6-9FBC-65BCDA1B83EF@hub.org>
References:  <1E68EFDC-B104-40CC-ADB8-0D4B522B66E2@hub.org> <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903021047480.1450@mail.fig.ol.no> <CC45FB32-EF5B-47E6-9FBC-65BCDA1B83EF@hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 01:31-0800, Marc G Fournier wrote:

> Please provide URLs to those pages that you are having issues with …

Now, a few days later, almost everything seems to be in order.

A couple of days ago, these URLs gave error messages:

http://bsdstats.org/bt/releases.html
http://bsdstats.org/bt/devices.html

Also, the majority of images doesn't show up when vieweing the latter URL.

-- 
Trond.
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Wed Mar  6 10:23:54 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2079150B4F4
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  6 Mar 2019 10:23:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no
 [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D0EE86868
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2019 10:23:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x26ANo8N055729
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 11:23:50 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
Received: from localhost (trond@localhost)
 by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x26ANn7H055726
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 11:23:50 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 11:23:49 +0100 (CET)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no
To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: BSDStats ... are  you reporting?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903061051190.11588@mail.fig.ol.no>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903061121130.11588@mail.fig.ol.no>
References: <1E68EFDC-B104-40CC-ADB8-0D4B522B66E2@hub.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903021047480.1450@mail.fig.ol.no>
 <CC45FB32-EF5B-47E6-9FBC-65BCDA1B83EF@hub.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903061051190.11588@mail.fig.ol.no>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16)
Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet
OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.fig.ol.no
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:23:55 -0000

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:55+0100, Trond Endrestøl wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 01:31-0800, Marc G Fournier wrote:
> 
> > Please provide URLs to those pages that you are having issues with …
> 
> Now, a few days later, almost everything seems to be in order.
> 
> A couple of days ago, these URLs gave error messages:
> 
> http://bsdstats.org/bt/releases.html
> http://bsdstats.org/bt/devices.html
> 
> Also, the majority of images doesn't show up when vieweing the latter URL.

The webserver is apparently set to serve UTF-8 encoded text, but the 
webpages are encoded using singlebyte characters even for characters > 127.

Example: http://bsdstats.org/bt/home.html?os=FreeBSD

-- 
Trond.
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Wed Mar  6 10:29:45 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6071F150B919
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  6 Mar 2019 10:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from su-@tutamail.com)
Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "tutanota.de",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB2686AC0
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2019 10:29:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from su-@tutamail.com)
Received: from w2.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.163])
 by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6BAFA0197
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2019 10:29:40 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tutamail.com;
 s=20161216; t=1551868180;
 bh=ASlBHlBRdxh1j4uDr7Ulpxm+0pLaLAJk6HDkPKip4GE=;
 h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From;
 b=Y0bXGCxdDip3TIqRM4vT6nmZ17dKuXbGlKb1rqMMlk89c0q3m7amwED04nIWsGcNW
 ai6KgD+ZYP9eEW6flD8sihODj4/ep79sRB144lm8Co2Oeky0IEJ9m4mWU1Wj21lT0y
 nvho7b9/SeYQD2g0NrlPRLAVr+kMLb1ZDC/bXQlotyMC44IZ/g52IQQKOSvL9CMysG
 3gtY1auGBs63EUUD6n7kEnyofQDrFslze8Z5nv1LphKoCL+v8+koXj07AHPQJggaJq
 FamyCI0oqz9B+A0NiR+6Pbsl3Qq//oMNLtjOMpI+TYQtYfvjB7kcILcs72WcA1Y6td
 BTImZCebiz0+w==
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 11:29:40 +0100 (CET)
From: <su-@tutamail.com>
To: Freebsd Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <L_HYIOP--B-1@tutamail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190306000442.5f924c90.freebsd@edvax.de-L_F7VCh----1>
References: <L_DQyxt--3-1@tutamail.com> <<L_DQyxt--3-1@tutamail.com>>
 <20190306000442.5f924c90.freebsd@edvax.de-L_F7VCh----1>
Subject: Re: UFS Encrypted Automated Install
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5BB2686AC0
X-Spamd-Bar: ------
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 dkim=pass header.d=tutamail.com header.s=20161216 header.b=Y0bXGCxd;
 dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tutamail.com;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of su-@tutamail.com designates 81.3.6.162 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=su-@tutamail.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.38 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tutamail.com:s=20161216];
 RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:81.3.6.160/28];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain];
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[7];
 RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 IP_SCORE(-3.34)[ip: (-8.57), ipnet: 81.3.0.0/18(-4.41), asn: 24679(-3.73),
 country: DE(-0.01)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.tutanota.de];
 DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tutamail.com:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.926,0];
 DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tutamail.com,none];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[162.6.3.81.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.1];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:24679, ipnet:81.3.0.0/18, country:DE];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:29:45 -0000

I just found it very odd the installer had an option to auto encrypt zfs (w=
hich i assume is done on the same principles as you highlighted below) and =
not for UFS...=C2=A0=C2=A0=20

--=20
 Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox:=20
 https://tutanota.com


6 Mar 2019, 00:04 by freebsd@edvax.de:

> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:19:13 +0100 (CET), > su-@tutamail.com <mailto:su-@t=
utamail.com>>  wrote:
>
>> Are there any plans to have an automated encrypted=C2=A0 UFS install opt=
ion
>> in the freebsd iso's (what encryption options were available prior to zf=
s)
>>
>
> UFS does not have a native encryption mechanism. It has to be added
> by an additional layer, and GELI is the common suggestion, even though
> you can also use GDBE.
>
> More information here:
>
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/disks-encrypting.html <https://www.f=
reebsd.org/doc/handbook/disks-encrypting.html>
>
> Don't be confused by the examples using the MBR slice + BSD partitions
> approach. It works the same for today's disks and SSDs with GPT. :-)
>
> You could probably do something like this: In the installer, drop to
> the command line and prepare the disk. Create the partitions and set
> the required flags; use "geli init", then "geli attach", and then use
> newfs with options as needed. Add a label with "newfs -L" if you wish.
> To check if everything works as intended, mount and umount the partition.
> Then return to the installer, _not_ using "geli detach". The installer
> should then be able to use /dev/ada0p1.eli as / partition.
>
> I have not tested this particular approach (mine are usually entirely
> scripted), but this should be possible with the current version of
> bsdinstall.
>
> Having a convenient option in bsdinstall to automate the tasks of prepari=
ng
> (initializing and attaching) target partition(s) for a system installatio=
n
> would be nice.
>
>
> --=20
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>>  ma=
iling list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions <https://lis=
ts.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd=
.org <mailto:freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>> "
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903061051190.11588>