Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:27:42 +0200
From:      "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" <listsub@401.cx>
To:        Andy Greenwood <greenwood.andy@gmail.com>
Cc:        Lane <lane@joeandlane.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Rik Davis <rik_davis2004@yahoo.com>
Subject:   Re: Ports collection issue
Message-ID:  <4542094E.8050809@401.cx>
In-Reply-To: <3ee9ca710610270541m153e68d2i427a106afabcc57e@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20061027000754.86183.qmail@web58305.mail.re3.yahoo.com>	 <200610262236.46586.lane@joeandlane.com> <4541F8AC.1030502@401.cx> <3ee9ca710610270541m153e68d2i427a106afabcc57e@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andy Greenwood wrote:
> Is it possible to use csup with my existing cvsup files? I skimmed the
> man page and it looks very similar. Is there any advantage to using
> cvsup over csup?

I use the same files for csup as I used for cvsup. You should not
have to change anything except removing the 'v' after the 'c' in
'cvsup' on the command-line. :)

Csup is basically cvsup rewritten in C instead of Modula-3. While
cvsup is an excellent program that certainly makes exactly what it
was designed to do, it unfortunately has some dependencies that are
not common on most installations.
I do not know of any advantages that cvsup might have over csup,
more then the fact that it is a thoroughly tested program that has
performed well for several years, while csup is a relatively new
program. AFAIK there has not been any reports of problem with csup
though, so I would say its safe to use.

--
R




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4542094E.8050809>