From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 22:43:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6447137B419; Tue, 6 May 2003 22:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perrin.int.nxad.com (internal.ext.nxad.com [69.1.70.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933D043F75; Tue, 6 May 2003 22:43:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sean@perrin.int.nxad.com) Received: by perrin.int.nxad.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 20A6720F00; Tue, 6 May 2003 22:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 22:43:02 -0700 From: Sean Chittenden To: David O'Brien Message-ID: <20030507054302.GH49916@perrin.int.nxad.com> References: <200305070448.h474m5Pg089875@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030507053358.GA44056@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030507053358.GA44056@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Key: finger seanc@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3849 3760 1AFE 7B17 11A0 83A6 DD99 E31F BC84 B341 X-Web-Homepage: http://sean.chittenden.org/ cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/bison1875 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 05:43:06 -0000 > > with a new port. Installs as bison and _not_ bison1875 and > > should be mutually exclusive to the main bison port. Hopefully > > the bison authors will > > Why aren't you installing it as something other than > PREFIX/bin/bison? Unlike autoconf and friends, bison is called in the build process and is almost always hard coded. Enough ports don't break so as opposed to chasing around the ports tree hunting down and replacing bison with bison1875, it seemed good enough to keep this hanging around with out mangling ports. It's not ideal, but it's not like autoconf where we can substitute running autoconf with autoconf213. -sc -- Sean Chittenden