From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 16 18:08:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19409953 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF18B92D for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz9fg-00076x-7b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:08:20 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:08:20 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:08:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Purpose of /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg? Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: < 186E6FB9-693F-40EA-BC93-5FE7457097FB@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:08:24 -0000 On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:05:19 -0700, Charles Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Walter Hurry wrote: >> What is the purpose of /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg? > > It holds old versions of shared libraries which were once used by > installed ports. > >> As far as I can see, in a properly organised system, all the shared >> libraries in there should be redundant. > > True, assuming you've recompiled all of your ports to use the latest > versions. However, if you ever have to roll something back, it will > continue to work if these old shared libs are available. > >> If this is correct, is there an easy way to clear them out, or should I >> just rm? > > If you're low on space, sure, you can just rm them. Don't bother > otherwise... > Thanks. No, I'm not desperately low on space; I just like to keep things tidy.