From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Jan 30 21:44:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA37CC8D95 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1E3ED8 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0ULiodq045285 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:44:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204340] [panic] nfsd, em, msix, fatal trap 9 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:44:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, crash, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rmacklem@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rmacklem@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9- mfc-stable10+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:44:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204340 --- Comment #20 from Rick Macklem --- Well, you should never kill the nfsd with SIGKILL. The way that is intended to be "safe" is to send SIGUSR1 to the "(master)" nfsd. It will shut things down and kill off the other threads. I'm not sure that I know of any way to make SIGKILL safe. I'm pretty sure "man nfsd" says this, but maybe it needs more emphasis? I also believe that /etc/rc.d/nfsd does this correctly. rick --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=