Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:02:04 -0600
From:      Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org>
To:        vehemens <vehemens@verizon.net>
Cc:        freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: xorg ports roadmap?
Message-ID:  <1259431324.2315.14.camel@balrog.2hip.net>
In-Reply-To: <200911271601.47677.vehemens@verizon.net>
References:  <d873d5be0911091618s106d2a09ub4845e75cd5876a2@mail.gmail.com> <200911261455.40399.vehemens@verizon.net> <20091127205335.GB81095@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200911271601.47677.vehemens@verizon.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:01 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> On Friday 27 November 2009 12:53:35 Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2009-Nov-26 14:55:40 -0800, vehemens <vehemens@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >If your having so many problems with these updates, why not just split
> > > ports into current and stable branches?
> >
> > This isn't as easy as it sounds because there are interactions between
> > so many different pieces.  Back when X.org/XFree86 was a small number
> > of ports (basically server, libraries and base clients), it wouldn't
> > have been too hard.  X.org now comprises something like 250 pieces
> > with not-very-well documented interactions.
> >
> > It might help if X.org could be cleanly split into client ports and
> > server ports but even that's not possible because they both depend
> > on a number of X-related libraries.
> 
> The suggestion was to have the entire ports tree as both a current and stable 
> branch, then using the same (similar?) rules as used for the source branches.
> 
> A ports freeze would mean that changes to the stable branch would be limited, 
> but work could still go on in the current branch.
> 
> The MFC process could be semi-automated.

This is hard enough to manage in src for one -CURRENT and 2/3 stable
branches... Ports would be insanity and would in no way help to address
the current issues or reduce the amount of work needed to get things
done.

robert.

-- 
Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org>
FreeBSD




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1259431324.2315.14.camel>