From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 18 21:59:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA17571 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 21:59:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA17561 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 21:59:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA23781; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 21:59:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199809190459.VAA23781@austin.polstra.com> To: bde@zeta.org.au Subject: Re: __ELF__ and the likes In-Reply-To: <199809180512.PAA10629@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199809180512.PAA10629@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 21:59:17 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <199809180512.PAA10629@godzilla.zeta.org.au>, Bruce Evans wrote: > >Are there plans for implementing __ELF__ as a cpp define? > > I hope not. I'm curious about this. I've always felt that cpp should do exactly the same thing as "cc -E". Why is it that we don't do that? John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message