From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 9 14: 9:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7D437C3D2 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 14:09:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm006-041.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.81.25]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14383; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:08:19 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2E4D1951; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:07:14 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Yen-Ming Lee Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, Scott Blachowicz Subject: Re: ports/19014: new port: sysutils/rmm Message-ID: <20000609170714.S6343@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200006051530.IAA43172@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200006051530.IAA43172@freefall.freebsd.org>; from scott@rresearch.com on Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 08:30:02AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 08:30:02AM -0700, Scott Blachowicz wrote: > FYI...the MH and nmh mail client packages each have a command called "rmm" > (remove message) and installing this port along with one of those would cause > problems. I wonder if there should be some warning about it. Or how DO we > handle namespace conflicts? I need an answer to this. I suggest renaming the binary of this port to something else. MAINTAINER ? -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message