From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 15 10:12:42 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA06256 for current-outgoing; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 10:12:42 -0800
Received: from ParC02.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (ParC02.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.212.42]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA06240 for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 10:12:29 -0800
Received: by ParC02.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE id AA00956
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org); Wed, 15 Mar 1995 19:11:52 +0100
Message-Id: <199503151811.AA00956@ParC02.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE>
From: se@MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (Stefan Esser)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 19:11:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com>
       "Re: Any one seeing these... sd0(ncr0:0:0):" (Mar 15,  8:41)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Any one seeing these... sd0(ncr0:0:0):
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mar 15,  8:41, Peter Dufault wrote:
} Subject: Re: Any one seeing these... sd0(ncr0:0:0):
} Rodney W. Grimes writes:
} > 
} > I get a console message on rare occasion that just says:
} > sd0(ncr0:0:0):
} > 
} > No message content, just the unit and controller info :-(.  Any one
} > have any idea's as to where in the scsi code this might be comming
} > from??
} 
} Most likely candidate I spotted is this around 5565 of pci/ncr.c.
} I suspect PRINT_ADDR should be conditional on the debug logic.
} 
} >	case SIR_SENSE_FAILED:
} >		/*-------------------------------------------
} >		**	While trying to select for
} >		**	getting the condition code,
} >		**	a target reselected us.
} >		**-------------------------------------------
} >		*/
} >		PRINT_ADDR(cp->xfer);
} >		if (DEBUG_FLAGS & DEBUG_RESTART)
} >			printf ("in getcc reselect by t%d.\n",
} >				INB(nc_ssid)&7);

O, well, ... 

You are right. This seems 
to be the one occurance of 
sc_print_addr(), that isn't 
correctly conditionalized.

Just being fixed ...

STefan