From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 4 7:47:43 2001 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 07:47:38 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from magellan.palisadesys.com (magellan.palisadesys.com [192.188.162.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9607737B402 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:47:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ghelmer@localhost) by magellan.palisadesys.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f04FlZN11522; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:47:35 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:47:35 -0600 (CST) From: Guy Helmer To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (forw) Two NICs In FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20010103234151.R292@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1 > > Hi can we axe this message already? I see the possibility of using > two 100mbit cards on a switch with a gig uplink to be reason enough > to either axe it, or make it a sysctl to quiet the warnings. > > I've also had this broken config setup as a temporary thing and > my console getting flooded was also quite irritating. > > Anyone going to raise a rukus if I turn it > a) off > b) sysctl default off > c) sysctl default on > > thanks, > -Alfred I have also suggested this (a sysctl knob) within the past few weeks and had no negative responses. However, since I have not received any messages saying "this exists for such-and-such a reason", I vote for (a). If you don't do it soon, I will :-) Guy > ----- Forwarded message from Tim Gustafson ----- > > From: Tim Gustafson > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Two NICs In FreeBSD > Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 23:37:06 -0500 > Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010103233521.00a58890@esther.falconsoft.com> > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Hello > > I just installed two NIC cards into my FreeBSD machine that are on the same > LAN, each with a different IP. However, I keep getting this sort of > message in my syslog: > > /kernel: arp: 1.2.3.4 is on dc0 but got reply from 00:00:c5:79:d0:0c on dc1 > > I realize that the message is because it's getting two ARP replies, but > this is normal (for this network, anyhow). How can I suppress these > messages from appearing in the syslog? Is it OK to have both interfaces > receiving ARP replies? Will this mess anything up? > > Tim -- Guy Helmer, Ph.D. Sr. Software Engineer, Palisade Systems --- ghelmer@palisadesys.com http://www.palisadesys.com/~ghelmer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message