From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 16:21:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE34916A41F for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:21:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FD443D7F for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:21:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jANGKwaM044870; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:20:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:20:58 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20051123162057.GF6893@dan.emsphone.com> References: <0451409FD6EF4F49AE13E3D1DD45280027E2B0@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> <444q6377yu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <444q6377yu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: "Pratt, Benjamin E." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libnet* questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:21:26 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 23), Lowell Gilbert said: > "Pratt, Benjamin E." writes: > > Hello, I'm writing to find out what others do, and what I can do, > > to work with ports that require the now three different libnet* > > ports. What I've been doing, and it seems like there should be an > > easier way, is installing one libnet*, for instance net/libnet then > > running portupgrade. I then deinstall net/libnet, install > > net/libnet-devel and run portupgrade. Now there's net/libnet10 that > > I've got to deal with as well. > > > > What is the best way people have found to get around package > > conflicts with these ports? > > I haven't noticed any conflicts with these ports. libnet and > libnet10 don't conflict at all -- they can be installed on the same > machine -- and libnet-devel isn't required by anything else as far as > I can see. On my system, both libnet and libnet10 both install a /usr/local/libnet/libnet.a and /usr/local/include/libnet/*.h files, which is just about as conflicting as you can get :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com