Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:50:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KSE threading support (first parts) Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010427154434.12501B-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <15081.50170.297579.938254@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Nate Williams wrote: > > Well, that's complete bullshit. KSE's are extremely short-running > > affairs in kernel mode, especially when you consider the most likely > > asynchronizing case (a simple blocking situation that will most commonly > > be in a read() or write()). > > Not necessarily. My experience with developing and running applications > on Solaris says that having multiple KSE's/process is a *huge* win. You do know that the proposed implementation isn't quite like Solaris (KSEs don't get their own quantum). You better holler if you want it ;-) -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1010427154434.12501B-100000>