From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 10:23:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E29C37B401; Thu, 22 May 2003 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D5D43F75; Thu, 22 May 2003 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott_long@btc.adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4MHJ3Z00759; Thu, 22 May 2003 10:19:03 -0700 Received: from btc.adaptec.com (hollin.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.253.56]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA28984; Thu, 22 May 2003 10:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ECD06CE.1090005@btc.adaptec.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:20:14 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nate Lawson References: <20030522100612.X95471@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20030522100612.X95471@root.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD 5.1b2 Inst. Results on Dell i8500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 17:23:55 -0000 Nate Lawson wrote: >>Your patch works wonderfully on my Dell 8200. What are the risks of the >>patch? I'd like to put it into 5.1 if possible. > > > No, please do not add this patch. It was authored by Mark Santcroos > and is a reduction in correctness. See this message > where the correct thing to do is to add RefOf() and DerefOf() to the ASL. > > http://home.jp.freebsd.org/cgi-bin/showmail/acpi-jp/2258 > > -Nate Ok, thanks for the information. Unfortunately, the current ACPI drop has the appearance of being a bit of a regression for many people. If this implies that lots of ASL/AML out there is buggy, it still won't be very satisfying for users. What is an acceptable solution here? Scott