From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 01:38:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7B816A4CE; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 01:38:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp (watery.cc.kogakuin.ac.jp [133.80.152.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9856643D1F; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 01:38:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])i2E9cXxD058143; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:38:34 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:36:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040314.183656.71104998.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: peter@wemm.org From: Takahashi Yoshihiro In-Reply-To: <200403132113.05474.peter@wemm.org> References: <200403131948.20774.peter@wemm.org> <20040314.125403.41652080.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200403132113.05474.peter@wemm.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/amd64/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/compat/netbsd dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/dev/ct bshw_machdep.c ct.c ct_isa.c src/sys/dev/ncv ncr53c500.c ncr53c500_pccard.c ncr53c500hw.h ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:38:36 -0000 In article <200403132113.05474.peter@wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: > > > > > Move the non-MD machine/dvcfg.h and machine/physio_proc.h to > > > > > a common MI area before they proliferate more. > > > > > > > > Why these are in compat/netbsd? These sure are obtained from > > > > NetBSD/pc98, but not for compatible mode with NetBSD. > > > > > > Is there a better place? I'd be happy to move them elsewhere.. > > > perhaps dev/pc98/*? compat/pc98/*? > > > > These are also not for pc98 only. I think that sys/sys is a better. > > No, sys/sys is not a dumping ground for this kind of thing. Now that > I've gone looking, I have just noticed sys/device_port.h - I am not > happy about that one being there either. It doesn't appear to be in > NetBSD either. How about sys/dev/*? I can't think where is a good place..., but it is sure that compat/netbsd is not a suitable place. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro