From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 12 22:56:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA06993 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 22:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (cisco-ts6-line5.uoregon.edu [128.223.150.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA06988 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 22:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA18087; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 22:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 22:56:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: Richard Jones cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PThreads on FreeBSD 2.2.1-R and later - how stable? In-Reply-To: <34158852.67251B08@imcl.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 9 Sep 1997, Richard Jones wrote: > After the last attempt to get OmniORB running with PThreads and > so on, I began to wonder exactly how stable PThreads is on > 2.2.1-R. Is it worth upgrading to 2.2.2 or even 3.0 to get > better support for PThreads? I know that the omniorb porting group worked with the -hackers mailing list about getting necessary changes into pthreads, so an upgrade to -current might help you. You'll have to ask hackers@freebsd.org/check mail archives or contact the maintainer of the omniorb port. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major Spam routed to /dev/null by Procmail | Death to Cyberpromo