From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 22:18:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AF41065677; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from istc.kiev.ua (wolf.istc.kiev.ua [193.108.236.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E70E8FC14; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from [91.123.146.100] (helo=ravenloft.kiev.ua) by istc.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1K6CB1-00070s-6l; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:18:55 +0300 Received: from kozlov by ravenloft.kiev.ua with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1K6CAe-000B6E-Qs; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:18:28 +0300 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:18:28 +0300 From: Alex Kozlov To: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org, cperciva@FreeBSD.org, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua Message-ID: <20080610221828.GA42572@ravenloft.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: Alex Kozlov X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Content analysis detailz: (0.0 points, 10.0 required) Cc: Subject: Re: INDEX build optimizations - please review X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:18:59 -0000 On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:52:01PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Alex Kozlov wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX > >> builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am > >> particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes > >> built locally: the only diff should be in audio/festvox-hvs [1]. > > Work on RELENG_6 only after this patch (maybe good candidate for MFC): > > Crap! I need :u! Without it the duplicate removal will have to be > pushed into the perl script that collates the output, which means that > Colin's portsnap script may be affected. > > The patch definitely should be MFCed though. Who committed it > originally to HEAD? var.c Revision 1.161 Sat Apr 8 06:59:54 2006 UTC (2 years, 2 months ago) by fjoe -- Adios