From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 10 12:54:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12086 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:54:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA12067 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:53:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 0zzRrH-0000uw-00; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:53:15 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.1/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA13011; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:51:18 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199901102051.NAA13011@harmony.village.org> To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: Why doscmd isn't builded by default? Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Jan 1999 13:40:04 EST." References: Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:51:17 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Alfred Perlstein writes: : > I'm looking into -CURRENT src/usr.bin/Makefile and there isn't any : > information about doscmd so it isn't builded by default. : > Is there any reason not to build doscmd by default? : : It requires X. It doesn't require X. It will use X if it is present, however. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message