From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Apr 5 0:17:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (mta.xtra.co.nz [203.96.92.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F62F14F55 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 00:17:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkmale@pop3.xtra.co.nz) Received: from wocker ([210.55.164.76]) by mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v04.00.02.07 201-227-108) with SMTP id <19990405071708.EHEJ5596385.mta1-rme@wocker>; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 19:17:08 +1200 From: "Dan Langille" Organization: The FreeBSD Diary To: Sue Blake Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 19:16:32 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Another Installation Guide [was: FreeBSD Advocacy] Reply-To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz Cc: doc@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <19990405164928.40818@welearn.com.au> References: <37053C70.A99BEB29@uswest.net>; from Nocturne on Fri, Apr 02, 1999 at 01:53:52PM -0800 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Message-Id: <19990405071708.EHEJ5596385.mta1-rme@wocker> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 5 Apr 99, at 16:49, Sue Blake wrote: > Having decided to proceed, you've got a big choice to make. > Do you want this to be an independent effort, or a FreeBSD project? > There are pros and cons with each, but you can't have it both ways. This is something I may have missed before. Everyone seems to agree an IG is needed. We now seem only to be debating the form: should it be part of the Handbook or not. Does this mean that if the IG is not part of the Handbook, then it's not a FreeBSD Project? [this isn't directed necessarily at you Sue] -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary http://www.FreeBSDDiary.com/freebsd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message