From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon May 22 05:45:37 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA23313
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 22 May 1995 05:45:37 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA23307
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 May 1995 05:45:35 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id FAA19610; Mon, 22 May 1995 05:45:16 -0700
Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 05:45:16 -0700
Message-Id: <199505221245.FAA19610@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de
CC: ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199505211016.MAA20048@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> (message from Julian Howard Stacey on Sun, 21 May 1995 12:16:49 +0200)
Subject: Re: blt-1.7 is INTERACTIVE
From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * checking for ranlib
 * ......
 * checking for tcl.h
 * What directory contains tcl.h (absolute path) ?

Hmm, this is strange.  It should find tcl.h, as this port depends on
tk, which depends on tcl so for the make of blt to reach this stage,
tcl.h should be already installed on your system.

And it certainly works here.  Can you tell us where your tcl.h is?
(It's supposed to be in /usr/local/include.)

 * I also suggest you change:
 * 	# Whom:                 wollman
 * to an email address, as i cant remember your email address off hand,
 * (i'm off line)

The e-mail addresses without domains in the "Whom" line is assumed to
be "@FreeBSD.ORG".  This is true for most (all?) of the ports.

Satoshi