Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Apr 1998 20:13:08 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Wolfgang Helbig <helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE>
To:        blaz@gold.amis.net (Blaz Zupan)
Cc:        freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: i4b-L1-F_ill:What is this? (fwd)
Message-ID:  <199804041813.UAA00635@rvc1.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980404191042.271A-100000@gold.amis.net> from Blaz Zupan at "Apr 4, 98 07:13:23 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Please apply this patch:
> > And then after rebooting try to get a connection from the computer, by
> > trying to establish a ppp connection.
> 
> I'm now running with the patch and after a reboot I could successfully
> establish a connection, although on the console I could see:
> 
> Apr  4 19:09:37 gold /kernel: isppp0: phase establish
> Apr  4 19:09:37 gold /kernel: i4b-L2-i4b_tei_assign: tx TEI ID_Request
> Apr  4 19:09:37 gold /kernel: i4b-L1-ph_data_req: Not in ST_F7,
> sc->sc_I430state = F3a Power Down
> Apr  4 19:09:37 gold isdnd[204]: DMN rate=150 sec/unit (day=6, beg=5,
> end=21, current=19)
> Apr  4 19:09:37 gold isdnd[204]: CHD 00001 dialing out from 3001551 to
> 3003030
> Apr  4 19:09:39 gold /kernel: i4b-L2-i4b_T202_timeout: unit 0, N202 = 3
> Apr  4 19:09:39 gold /kernel: i4b-L2-i4b_tei_assign: tx TEI ID_Request
> Apr  4 19:09:39 gold /kernel: i4b-L2-i4b_tei_rx_frame: TEI ID Assign - TEI
> = 70
> 
> So it seems like the TEI request failed on the first try and succeded on
This is expected, because of the patch the activation of layer 1 is delayed
until needed for the TEI request. 

So we learned that the ASCOM-NT does not like an activation of layer1,
if the activated layer1 is not used for anything. This is very similar
to my NT from the german telecom. But then i4b tries to reactivate
layer 1. This is successfull with my NT but seemingly not with the
ASCOM-NT.

> the second try. I will be running this kernel some more time to catch any
> other possible problems. I have also compiled a kernel without
> I4B_SMP_WORKAROUND from the same sources (and with the patch) and if the
> kernel that I'm running right now will work without problems I will reboot
> with the non-smp-workaround kernel and test that for some time.

Thank you!

Wolfgang

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804041813.UAA00635>