From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 19 06:23:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 0A36642D; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:26 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Xin LI Subject: Re: svn commit: r321227 - in head/net/iet: . files Message-ID: <20130619062325.GE61109@FreeBSD.org> References: <201306190224.r5J2OlM0017324@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201306190224.r5J2OlM0017324@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:26 -0000 On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:24:47AM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > New Revision: 321227 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/321227 > > Log: > Unbreak on recent -CURRENT. > > @@ -1,13 +1,9 @@ > [...] > PORTNAME= iet > PORTVERSION= 1.4.20.2 > -PORTREVISION= 5 > +PORTREVISION= 6 I don't see why PORTREVISION was bumped for a build fix. Or the package could be built, but was somehow bad? ./danfe