From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 25 6:24:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fed-ef1.frb.gov (fed.frb.gov [132.200.32.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE35015648 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 06:24:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org) Received: by fed-ef1.frb.gov; id JAA19174; Tue, 25 May 1999 09:24:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1pmdf.frb.gov(192.168.3.38) by fed.frb.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma018753; Tue, 25 May 99 09:23:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 09:23:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Seth Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? In-reply-to: <19990525053706.15157.qmail@nym.alias.net> To: Sergey Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Why not upgrade to -STABLE and solve the problem? I also had panics under 3.1-RELEASE, but they were all fixed within one week of -STABLE upgrades. SB On Tue, 25 May 1999, Sergey wrote: > Hi! > > I've checked this out on good hardware. And now can CLAIM that > 3.1-R *really* have kernel problems on FreeBSD's "classic" configuration. > This bug causes TERRIBLE instability - panic in 24 hours. Even Microsoft's > OSes gives significantly better results > > > > This is mourning day for me - I CAN'T believe in stability of RELEASES > any more... > > > With best regards, Sergey. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message