From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 1 11:31:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A3937B401; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:31:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2338E43E88; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:31:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gB1JUtrT018011; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:30:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gB1JV5VL004487; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:31:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gB1JV5CF004486; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:31:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:31:05 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Robert Watson Cc: Jake Burkholder , "Daniel C. Sobral" , Ruslan Ermilov , current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG, Warner Losh , Doug Barton , Peter Wemm Subject: Patches reviewed [was: Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT] Message-ID: <20021201193105.GA4402@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20021201121355.A26595@locore.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:12:36PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > There I go reply to all... > > > > > > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the > > > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy > > > here. > > > > Agree, I don't see any use in supporting upgrades without going through > > 4.x-STABLE first. > > It's nice that you guys are in agreement on that fact, but perhaps you'd > like to do something constructive like to look at and review the patches? Done. The patches look good. > Avoiding the install of a new make during a build is highly desirable, > even if you don't believe in updating from old RELENG_4. Agreed (it's so nice to be in agreement :-) A regular buildworld failed even when upgrading a less-than-a-week old -current. The removal of anything we install as part of a build phase is good and not tied to the (version) distance of the upgrade. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message