From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  8 10:19:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BEF37B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  8 May 2003 10:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9796B43F75
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  8 May 2003 10:19:07 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h48HJ4Tl020726;
	Thu, 8 May 2003 11:19:04 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 11:18:36 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030508.111836.130233489.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: gallatin@cs.duke.edu
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <16058.36990.299231.566625@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
References: <20030508.124929.74756191.haro@kgt.co.jp>
	<20030508.102242.72244093.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<16058.36990.299231.566625@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: LOR with -current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 17:19:08 -0000

In message: <16058.36990.299231.566625@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
            Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes:
: 
: M. Warner Losh writes:
:  > In message: <20030508.124929.74756191.haro@kgt.co.jp>
:  >             Munehiro Matsuda <haro@kgt.co.jp> writes:
:  > : Hi all,
:  > : 
:  > : I got this LOR with today's -current, when I tried to start X Window up.
:  > : 
:  > : lock order reversal
:  > :  1st 0xc30b94c0 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:507
:  > :  2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325
:  > 
:  > That reminds me, would anybody object if I were to hack traceback so
:  > that it would actually put the traceback in the dmesg buffer when not
:  > called from ddb?
: 
: FWIW, I think that tracebacks generated from DDB_TRACE should also
: go into the dmesg buffer.  It would save quite a few initial exchanges
: with users..

Does anybdoy know why the ddb output doesn't go into the dmesg buffer
in general?  It sure would save me a lot of grief as well if it did.

Warner