From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 17:48:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76B016A404 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8756413C43E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F2AEBC78; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:48:46 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Chad Perrin Message-Id: <20070426134846.d32e3993.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20070426172950.GA87931@demeter.hydra> References: <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070426172950.GA87931@demeter.hydra> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:48:49 -0000 In response to Chad Perrin : > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like > > fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources > > while none of you checked your sources ... > > > > Muhahaha ... > > > > In any event, it's been a fascinating sociological lesson for me. > > If you had provided the guy's Wikipedia account, we'd be able to check > *your* sources -- wouldn't we? As long as you don't tell us the > necessary information for checking up on it, we simply can't do anything > with it. I gave my source. Have you contacted him? Why are you accusing me of failing to do something that I did? > Sociological lesson? If you're just trying to get a reaction, I think > the technical term is actually "trolling". Don't invent things that aren't there. Yes, it's been a sociological lesson. No, I was not "trying to get a reaction". The major sociological lesson is the reaction that I _did_ get, which I did not expect, and (quite frankly) didn't want -- still don't, for that matter. Perhaps you should switch to decaf? As for me, I will post no more on this topic to questions@ as the subject matter is no longer relevant, and is obviously inflammatory. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com