From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 4 07:18:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA12651 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 07:18:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.cityip.co.za (ns.cityip.co.za [196.25.223.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA12616 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 07:18:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wjv@cityip.co.za) Received: from wjv by ns.cityip.co.za with local (Exim 1.82 #2) id 0yhaPl-0000tF-00; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 15:50:45 +0200 Subject: Re: Partition at 109%?? In-Reply-To: <3575A0D6.BEE33E82@designstein.com> from Brett Paden at "Jun 3, 98 02:15:34 pm" To: paden@designstein.com (Brett Paden) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 15:50:45 +0200 (SAT) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-PGP: ftp://ftp.cityip.co.za/users/wjv/pubkey.asc X-URL: http://www.cityip.co.za/~wjv/ X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Johann Visagie Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brett Paden wrote: > > I can remove and add to the root partion such that capacity ranges > anyhere between 100% and 110%. For exmaple, I can move the generic > kernel to /var/tmp (lowering / to 106% capacity) then put it back again. > > Is this merely as safety precaution, or is this a weird bug I am > witnessing? Standard behaviour in most unices, AFAIK. See tunefs(8). -- V Johann Visagie | Email: wjv@CityIP.co.za | Tel: +27 21 419-7878 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message