From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 27 06:08:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0D937B401 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:08:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (oberon.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua [195.245.194.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A78043F3F for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:08:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fi1214@ptf.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua) Received: by relay1.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (Postfix, from userid 426) id A6BF819A51; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:08:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from ally.ptf.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (eth0.ptf.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua [10.0.1.12]) by relay1.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2353A19B9C; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:08:31 +0200 (EET) Received: from fi1214 (helo=localhost) by ally.ptf.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua with local-esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18yY3T-000KcF-00; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:08:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:08:31 +0200 (EET) From: Paharenko Gleb To: Philip Payne In-Reply-To: <36D04A8168B2D41182250008C7E6F8780374F5DE@ukcamexch2.cbg.uk.corp.eu.uu.net> Message-ID: <20030327160713.X78311-100000@ally.ptf.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.4 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: 'Perica Veljanovski' cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Dual homed host routing problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:08:57 -0000 On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Philip Payne wrote: > > I'm running FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and I have trouble routing between two > > NIC's. On one side I have a 192.168.1.0/24 network and on the > > other a 212.110.94.64/27 > > network on which I have mail and web servers, which the 192.168.1.0/24 > > hosts should be able to reach. > > > > Here are the ifconfig and netstat -r outputs: > > wb0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 212.110.94.84 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 212.110.94.95 > > inet6 fe80::280:48ff:feb5:af3%wb0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > ether 00:80:48:b5:0a:f3 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > > inet6 fe80::202:44ff:fe4f:958e%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > > ether 00:02:44:4f:95:8e > > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > > status: active > > > > Routing tables > > Internet: > > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use > > Netif Expire > > default 212.110.94.65 UGSc 4 0 wb0 > > localhost localhost UH 0 0 lo0 > > 192.168.1 link#2 UC 1 > > 0 rl0 > > 192.168.1.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 1 45 rl0 > > 212.110.94.64/27 link#1 UC 8 0 wb0 > > > > and I have net.inet.ip.forwarding set to 1 > > > > How do I get my box to route packets between the two > > interfaces 192.168.1.1 > > and 212.110.94.84? > > It may not be the actual dual-homed boxes issue. For this to work > completely, the devices on the two networks you mention must also have the > correct routing. > > So, devices on 192.168.1.0/24 must have a route for 212.110.94.64/27 via > 192.168.1.1... most probably a default route as I assume the devices on > 192.168.1.0/24 are reaching the net via this box. > > In addition, any device on 212.110.94.64/27 that is supposed to reach > 192.168.1.0/24 devices must route 192.186.1.0/24 via 212.110.94.84. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm full down in networks,but you cat try to use routed,with strat up option -s .I think it must be work