From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Fri Jan 20 05:35:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F30CB9110; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5171AAB; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from besplex.bde.org (c122-106-153-191.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.153.191]) by mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 741F110450B0; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:35:21 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:35:21 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Sean Bruno cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r312434 - head/sys/sys In-Reply-To: <201701191958.v0JJw98r009581@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20170120162524.D1727@besplex.bde.org> References: <201701191958.v0JJw98r009581@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=H7qr+6Qi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Tj3pCpwHnMupdyZSltBt7Q==:117 a=Tj3pCpwHnMupdyZSltBt7Q==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=Ti_X0qcXNKnn0ZM1Vb4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:32 -0000 On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Sean Bruno wrote: > Author: sbruno > Date: Thu Jan 19 19:58:08 2017 > New Revision: 312434 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/312434 > > Log: > Adjust gtaskqueue startup again so that we catch the !SMP case and > users that choose not to use EARLY_AP_STARTUP. > > There is still an initialization issue/panic with !SMP and !EARLY_AP_STARTUP > that we have yet to resolve. > > Submitted by: bde It is more for "legacy" (non-MSI) interrupts with most of the 8 combinations SMP, EARLY_AP_STARTUP and (ncpus > 1). Some combinations work, but not the simplest ones with ncpus == 1 since the complications for the complex cases affect the simplest cases adversely. Bruce