From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 10:58:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1976BBC2945 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADEBB1D60 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [10.100.0.31] (haymarket.m5p.com [10.100.0.31]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7NAwO13033818 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:58:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Subject: Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20160819073422.4292997b@X220.alogt.com> <20160821144505.27c0f55d@X220.alogt.com> <20160822013051.GA14436@lonesome.com> <20160823143215.6bfab8ea@X220.alogt.com> From: George Mitchell Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:58:24 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160823143215.6bfab8ea@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mailhost.m5p.com [10.100.0.247]); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:58:30 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:58:34 -0000 On 08/23/16 02:32, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:22:35 +0000 > Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, 11:31 AM Mark Linimon >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:57:24AM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: >>>> unless knowledgable people respond publicly and/or in the phoronix >>>> forums [...] this interpretation of reality will be fixed in >>>> decision- makers' minds and consequently the uptake (and support) >>>> of FreeBSD. >>> >>> IIRC this has been done before and hasn't really been productive. >>> OTOH I don't recall the details. >>> >>> FreeBSD hasn't had a benchmarking guru since Kris Kennaway retired >>> from working on FreeBSD. >> >> >> Michael has reached out off-list (thanks!) If anyone else is >> interested, I'd be happy to create a dedicated IRC channel on >> freenode to widen and focus the freebsd performance discussion net >> and doc any outcomes/notes in the FreeBSD Wiki. >> > this is good. So, how can we help him to get things straight the next > time? > > Erich > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Off-the-wall note: has anyone tried comparing SCHED_ULE to SCHED_BSD? -- George