From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 27 12:43:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E2116A418 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk (outcold.yadt.co.uk [81.187.204.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F1F13C494 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B925B7B for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:24:58 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at yadt.co.uk Received: from outcold.yadt.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outcold.yadt.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJJniXTvQRtr for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:24:55 +0100 (BST) Received: by outcold.yadt.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E2E7A5B74; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:24:54 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:24:54 +0100 From: David Taylor To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071027122454.GA15883@outcold.yadt.co.uk> References: <200710252120.l9PLKYFJ041330@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> <47210FBE.6080803@gmail.com> <20071025220742.GA45217@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <200710251516.19505.fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710251516.19505.fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 ISO/ftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:43:48 -0000 On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Freddie Cash wrote: > On October 25, 2007 03:07 pm Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > > But csup does not yet support CVS mode, so you can't use it to maintain > > a local copy of the repository. For some people (including me) this > > means that csup is not yet a suitable replacement for CVSup. > > Maybe not, but for the bulk of the users of cvsup, csup is a drop-in > replacement. :) As with most things in Unix-land, there's more than one > way to do things, and every one will defend to the death their way of > doing things. :D I think the point is there _isn't_ more than one way to cvsup the CVS repo - csup currently cannot do that. -- David Taylor