From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Fri Apr 2 11:36:49 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BAB5CC0F6 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "slim.berklix.org", Issuer "slim.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBdLR35F3z4lSY for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p4fe6d3cc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.230.211.204]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 132BaeuK017167 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:36:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 132Bad79055375; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:36:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 132BaOGT094492; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:36:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <202104021136.132BaOGT094492@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Andre Albsmeier cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: No ports-cur ctm files going out via email? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com/jhs/ User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:38:11 +0200." Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 13:36:24 +0200 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FBdLR35F3z4lSY X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhs@berklix.com has no SPF policy when checking 94.185.90.68) smtp.mailfrom=jhs@berklix.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[79.230.211.204:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33824, ipnet:94.185.88.0/22, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[jhs]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[94.185.90.68:from:127.0.2.255]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[ctm-users] X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 11:36:49 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Andre Albsmeier > Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 06:38:11 +0200 Andre Albsmeier wrote: > On Thu, 01-Apr-2021 at 23:20:28 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > Me, bothering again: > > > > > > I was missing > > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 174038 Mar 30 06:30 ports-cur.13925.gz > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 30150 Mar 30 22:30 ports-cur.13926.gz > > > > > > while > > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 41716 Mar 29 14:31 ports-cur.13924.gz > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 2033 16 4148 Mar 31 14:34 ports-cur.13927.gz > > > > > > were received succesfully from ctm-ports-cur@mailman.berklix.org. > > > Regarding src-11 and src-12 I never have problems. > > > > > > Anybody else? > > > > Server ctm.berklix.org has > > Yes, the output of the files above came from ftp.berklix.org. Otherwise > I wouldn't have known that 13925 and 13926 already exist. When 13927 > came in properly and couldn't be applied I checked there and found them. > > > printenv TZ > > Europe/Berlin > > ls -l /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/ports-cur/ > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 41716 Mar 29 16:31 ports-cur.13924.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 174038 Mar 30 08:30 ports-cur.13925.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 30150 Mar 31 00:30 ports-cur.13926.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms ctm 4148 Mar 31 16:34 ports-cur.13927.gz > > & date shows in sync with radio wall clock > > > > I received all these by email (on my client host) > > The only explanation is that my company's mailserver was filtering them. Maybe some blocks of data matched a spam detector > However, I don't know what triggers this as others (and src-11 and src-12) > never are missing but for ports-cur this was not the first time. I did an OS upgrade a while back, affecting all lists, but I'm not aware of any disruption now. > I will subscribe to ports-cur from another address (which I have fully > under my control) and we'll see what will happen. Good idea. ports-cur-fast & ports-cur available via berklix.org ports-cur available via freebsd.org same ports-cur data is sent to both lists If you want to test if your company is maybe filtering on sender domain, you could sub. a test address to both sender domains, & compare. Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://stolenvotes.uk UK for Brexit stole 750K votes from Brits in EU & 3.7M globaly. Zap BoJo Mogg.