From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 17 10:20:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BA916A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:20:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D9A43D1D for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:20:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i5HAJGZd016668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:19:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i5HAJEIH016667; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:19:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:19:14 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Geert Hendrickx Message-ID: <20040617101914.GB15478@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Geert Hendrickx , mail25@bzerk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40D023A1.8090009@cs.uiowa.edu> <20040616140305.GD32001@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> <20040616145305.GB15913@ei.bzerk.org> <20040616153648.GA77456@lori.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040616153648.GA77456@lori.mine.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:19:17 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: mail25@bzerk.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:20:57 -0000 --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 05:36:49PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > Btw, can anyone of the sendmail-guru's tell me how sendmail compares perf= ormancewise? =20 It's not a stellar performer, but it does the job. Configuration may be a black art, but with sendmail there will always be some incantation that can get it to deal with whatever weird e-mail setup you can imagine. For a high traffic mailserver, I'd probably go with postfix. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA0XAiiD657aJF7eIRAn5MAJ9wVd8/W7jJydEfUwNbeioqz8/78gCeIXFN yEQevfAnCIrAdPG4SJ/gHwM= =dvu4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--